When evaluating rigging gear, which factor is less critical than inspection?

When evaluating rigging gear, maintenance records are less critical than inspection because while maintenance records provide valuable information about the historical upkeep and condition of the gear, they do not guarantee its current safety and effectiveness. The primary focus should always be on the actual condition of the rigging gear as determined through thorough inspections. Inspections allow for the identification of any visible wear, damage, or other issues that might compromise safety during use.

The other factors, such as load capacity, marking of equipment, and manufacturer's recommendations, play significant roles in ensuring safe rigging practices. Load capacity ensures that the gear can handle the weights it will be subjected to, marking of equipment facilitates easy identification of the gear's specifications and safety features, and adherence to manufacturer's recommendations ensures that the gear is used according to intended guidelines and limits. These elements directly impact the safe operation and reliability of rigging gear, making them more critical than the historical context provided by maintenance records.